[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Read this story in English | Add a translation >>

video:Senator Bennett endorses penny stock scam with Cheetah's Club striptease club connection.

Also the fraudulent and secretive ncans.net has San Diego Wells Fargo account and are represented by San Diego law firm SADR & BARRERA, APLC, ATTORNEY CLIENT TRUST, Account number 0430243675.Shouldn't someone tell this San Diego law firm they are representing illegal penny stock pump and dump criminals who will not identify themselves for that reason and that money laundering with penny stock shares is possibly involved ?



The following film was made by  http://www.ncans.net by an unidentified person who uses the alias 'Bob O'Brien' who Senator Bennett probably knows as James Dale Davidson of the Beltway and founder of National Taxpayers Union among other things.


Although it was cut out of the tape,Senator Bennett, during the hearing with the SEC's former Chairman Donaldson,particularly decries the non-existent problem of 'naked short selling' which is really a fraudulent claim used to mask unaudited shares and consequent illegal pump and dump operations of U.S.penny stocks both onshore from U.S. brokerages and offshore around the world, including terrorist suspect countries such as Kuala Lumpur,Dubai as well as Bermuda,etc..This both defrauds Americans and can be used in illicit money laundering operations.Why is the Senator unconcerned about that ?
This is also a follow up to my 'Google Censors Indymedia for Partick Byrne,Overstock.com' and another article-commentary here that should be found by doing a 'ryals' search of this utah.indymedia site.

The following film was made by  http://www.ncans.net by an unidentified person who uses the alias 'Bob O'Brien' who Senator Bennett probably knows as James Dale Davidson of the Beltway and founder of National Taxpayers Union among other things. Although it was cut out of the tape,Senator Bennett, during the hearing with the SEC's former Chairman Donaldson,particularly decries the non-existent problem of 'naked short selling' which is really a fraudulent claim used to mask unaudited shares and consequent illegal pump and dump operations of U.S.penny stocks both onshore from U.S. brokerages and offshore around the world, including terrorist suspect countries such as Kuala Lumpur,Dubai as well as Bermuda,etc..This both defrauds Americans and can be used in illicit money laundering operations.Why is the Senator unconcerned about that ?
This is also a follow up to my 'Google Censors Indymedia for Partick Byrne,Overstock.com' and another article-commentary here that should be found by doing a 'ryals' search of this utah.indymedia site.
For those who are unaware,Utah itself has a bad reputation for welcoming such criminality into the state.Nevada,Florida,and Texas do as well with Nevada being the most corrupt in my opinion.Even if Utah feels it benefits from such fraud,I doubt it does.It only invites criminals into the state and puts money into their pockets,at times ,at the expense of honest citizens of Utah.
While I may post additional commentary it should be noted that the Cheetah Club of Las Vegas is owned by the same father and son who own the Cheetah Club in San Diego that has been investigated for bribery and corruption of public officials there.And in fairness it was the ncan's founder's first stock promotion or tout website,  http://www.nfi-info.net ,founded to promote Novastar Financial or NFI,that specifically used the Cheetah Club,Las Vegas address.
NCANS' Mary Helburn is actually the 'star' of the video featuring Senator Bennett,whose link,as you can see, is below. She is the one who calls herself 'Mary Campbell' in the video and does not disclose she is the president of NCANS,that promotes a number of questionable,(to say the least ),penny stock companies who all have in common illegal,(if the SEC did its' job)pump and dump promotions such as the Global Links(gbll) that Senator Bennett was used in the promotion of !!!!
And they all avoid audits of shares they sell through brokers or even offshore 'boiler rooms' and thus, coincidentally,are very conducive to use for money laundering !! If you can't or don't audit shares,and the SEC fails miserably at this,you can't audit the flow of money .Get it ? Why is Senator Bennett aiding and abetting illegal penny stock pump and dump activities where terrorists or any other criminals would find harbor to launder money ?
And I challenge Senator Bennett,just as I did James Angel the Georgetown professor also appears in the video,(and who in fairness says he was videoed out of context),to prove Global Links,or any other penny stock for that matter, is the victim of 'naked shorting' as opposed to being frauds and covering up share flow auditing !!!
 http://www.tinyurl.com/5vq8y

Does Senator Bennett endorse the Cheetah Club striptease as well ?
Or is it only natural that the 'naked short scam' of Beltway connected James Dale Davidson's  http://www.ncans.net' ,or 'National Coalition Against Naked Short Selling, should have a Las Vegas striptease club connection,at least as a fraudulent address ?
And like his National Taxpayers Union and his now defunct National Association Against Naked Short Selling or 'NAANSS', which was also used to mask his illegal pump and dump of penny stocks both onshore and offshore,is it only natural that it should have the phoney pretense of 'national'in its acronym to divert attention from the fact that it is an international criminal,even money laundering, enterprise using unaudited shares of U.S. penny stocks to disguise the flow of money, often from defrauded Americans in illegal pump and dump activities to and for offshore entities,Americans or not.
And is it only 'natural' that it's original website at the time of the February 8,2005, $100,000 + ad-letter to President Bush in the Washington Post (and paid for in great part by Utah's and Overstock.com's Patrick Byrne),claiming Bush had to stop 'naked short selling' before it was safe to invest SS funds in stock markets, would be an address and website located in the British Virgen Islands ? The website was since moved to San Diego coincidentally.
Doesn't Senator Bennett realise he has been made a laughing stock by James Dale Davidson of the National Taxpayers Union,Agora Publications ,etc. ? And he is aiding and abetting illegal pumps and dumps and offhore money laundering though the SEC's absurd Reg.S and other penny stock share distribution schemes by touting for Davidson's ncans.net ? Doesn't he realise the anonymous person calling himself 'Bob O'Brien'(James Dale Davidson)used a fraudulent address,(the Cheetah striptease Club in Las Vegas!!),for this mafiosi scam ?
Doesn't Senator Robert Bennett realise that the 'stop naked shorting' fraud is a scam and he was set up by James Davidson and Senator Bennett's constituent in Utah,Patrick Byrne and his Overstock.com,who are the ones who placed the $100,000 plus ad-letter to President Bush in the Washington Post to promote a stock fraud claiming Social Security investing was threatened by 'naked short selling' when in truth the fraudulent claim was and is used to disguise the flow or manipulation and illegal pump and dump of penny stock shares aiding and abetting fraud and money laundering !? And far from protecting investors, he is working,knowingly or not, with their defrauders ?
And is the Securities Exchange Commission going to allow the 'naked short scam',(much worse than the Nigerian letter scam), to go on indefinitely when it is originating in their own Beltway backyard ? Will the fraudulent absurdity never end ? Do they want money to be laundered and American retail 'investors' in U.S.penny stocks to be defrauded by Beltway criminals and a Las Vegas penny stock mafia ?
Does Senator Bennett not realise that the website of the group his reputation has helped to promote had their website based in B.V.I. KNOWN FOR PENNY STOCK FRAUD AND MONEY LAUNDERING BEFORE MOVING IT TO SAN DIEGO ?
Senator Bennett and James Dale Davidson even touted the Global Links(gbll) penny stock as a victim of 'naked shorting'.This is why,ethically more than ever,it is important for Senator Bennett to acknowledge his assertion of it as being a victim of 'naked shorting selling' was false.Senator Bennett may be aiding and abetting money laundering through penny stocks wittingly or not through such false claims.
Some say a Mormon Bishop is behind the Global Links(gbll) scam.I don't know,but I do know that to knowingly promote Global Links as a victim of naked short selling' is fraud.
from the 'Bob O'Brien or James Dale Davidson  http://www.ncans.net website:
Never A Dull Moment
Mark Faulk, in one of his latest installments of The Faulking Truth, does a follow-up on the Global Links story - a saga that highlights the depth of the Fail To Deliver problem, and raises troubling questions about the role that the SEC and the DTCC are playing. His piece can be seen here. I note with wry amusement that the reporter he takes on as being one of the greatest disseminator of misleading information is one of our favorites: Carol Remond. She also happens to be the reporter that the hedge fund drive to discover my identity was shifted to when the issue became too embarrassing for WSJ Jesse Eisinger to pursue.
Here are a few select quotations from Mark's outstanding piece:
"... It seems that Robert Simpson, CEO of a small company in Michigan called Zann Corp., had bought every available share of Global Links Corp after the company had reduced their outstanding shares to about 1.1 million shares from more than 350 millions shares in early February. Incredibly, over the next two days, over 50 million shares traded hands, even though Simpson owned every share, and there were only 1.1 million shares even in existence.
The Global Links story is one that, like the Stockgate scandal itself, just won't go away. While some articles have called it the "poster child" of the Stockgate scandal, others have been more concerned with discussing their lack of financial success over the past few years, while ignoring the more important issue of how brokers could buy and sell almost fifty times the total issued shares in only two days, especially since those shares were presumably in the account of just one shareholder.
The Faulking Truth has received numerous emails from other GLKC stockholders who held shares totaling over 400,000 during the same time period. In fact, Global Links representative Patrick Donahoo says that "During the month of February, we were literally besieged by stockholders who were digging for information. While we cannot confirm exactly how many shares were purchased and held, we believe that this number exceeds 20 million shares." Twenty million shares out of a total available float of 1,158,064. Where did the other nineteen million shares come from?"
Now, I may not be a mathematician, but even I can understand that the likelihood of all of this being innocent is nil. And yet the system keeps insisting that there's no problem, and the DTCC is pushing the states to eliminate requirements for any paper certificates, thereby eliminating the only mechanism with which investors can verify that they aren't being screwed by the participants. Does any of this seem a trifle alarming? The entire trading/regulatory framework is simply ignoring the elephant in the room, while the DTCC works frantically to eliminate the last of the proof of malfeasance.
What's wrong with this picture?
Read all of Mark's piece - it's a stunner.

# posted by bob obrien @ 1:03 PM 0 comments
(The above writing of 'O'Brien' or James Dale Davidson from ncans.net,who along with Overstock.com's Patrick Byrne placed a $100,000+ ad-letter on February 8 in the Washington Post erroneously claiming 'naked short selling'to be the biggest danger to placing SS funds in stock markets.
This is also the penny stock specifically mentioned by
Senator Bennett in hearing with the SEC's Donaldson
as the poster child victim of 'naked short selling'.His erroneous comment actually caused a wave of buying of shares and consequent insider selling or dumping.Or what is known as an illegal 'pump and dump'.
The truth is, Mr.Davidson,founder of the National Taxpayers Union,and who is probably 'O'Brien' or his chief backer at ncans.net,fraudulently uses the claim to mask his illegal penny stock pumps and dumps and probably money laundering.)



WARNING NCANS SAN DIEGO IS A FRAUD.JUST SAY NO TO ATTORNEYS Sadr & Barrera
AS WELL AS WELLS FARGO BANK SAN DIEGO UNTIL THEY CEASE REPRESENTING AND AIDING AND ABETTING THESE CRIMINALS WHO RAN ILLEGAL PUMP AND DUMP OF ENDOVASC,MONTGOMERY,TEXAS FROM A CHARLES SCHWAB ACCOUNT AND DEFRAUDED ME !!!!! THEY THEN CLAIMED IT WAS NOT A PUMOP AND DUMP BUT NAKED SHORTING!
FRAUDULENT LIES !!!!! BOYCOTT Sadr & Barrera !!!

Wire Transfers:

WELLS FARGO BANK- Client Trust (Sadr & Barrera)
401 B Street, Suite 101
San Diego, CA 92101
ABA # 121000248

For Further Credit to SADR & BARRERA, APLC, ATTORNEY CLIENT TRUST, Account number 0430243675

Please email the firm at  sadr@sadrbarrera.com and let them know how much you sent and when so that they can account for it.

Checks:

Checks may be sent to the law firm at the below address—Make the checks out to Sadr & Barrera, APLC—please reference on checks "For NCANS".

Sadr & Barrera, APLC
401 West A Street, Suite 1815
San Diego, CA 92101
(619)233-8460 Phone
(619)239-0575 Facsimile


- e-mail:: ncansisscam@yahoo.com


Please Don't Feed the Trolls

Wikipedia defines an Internet Troll as: "either a person who sends messages on the Internet hoping to entice other users into angry or fruitless responses, or a message sent by such a person." San Diego IMC strives to provide both a grassroots media resource as well as a forum for people to contribute to a meaningful discussion about local issues. Please, when posting comments, be respectful of others and ignore those trying to interrupt or discourage meaningful discourse. Thank you.

-- San Diego Indymedia volunteers
  Download this article in pdf format >>

  Make a quick comment on this article>>


more about cheetah club,ncans.net,etc.

27.07.2005 23:23


from ncans.net:'She brought up the Cheetah Club and BVI locations of the www.nfi-info.net website registration, and seemed annoyed at my sense of humor. I can understand that not everyone has the same sense of humor, or any, for that manner. I think it's safe to say at this point that this was fairly adversarial - there wasn't a lot of interest in hearing about the issue, but rather a non-stop barrage of "when did you stop beating your wife" sorts of questions.'



Carol Remond of Dow Jones
Email is  Carol.Remond@dowjones.com
Bob O'Brien speaks with the press - a summary
I spoke at some length this morning with reporter from Dow Jones. She seemed troubled by the idea that I have chosen to remain anonymous. I pointed out that I have several attorney friends that indicated that was a prudent choice, as I didn't want a horse head in my bed one morning. She seemed to feel that it brought my message into question - she really seemed to dislike the idea that nobody else was troubled by it, that I was completely up-front as to why I had made that choice, and that it was common knowledge that I used a pseudonym for privacy reasons.

We discussed the Reg SHO problem, and her position was that the system seemed to be working, and that the Reg SHO list had all sorts of plausible explanations - none of which she was able to articulate for specific examples I brought up. I pointed out that the preliminary list had been circulated as of Dec. 3, and that many of the companies that had been on the list as of that date were still on it today. I also asked what her logic was for pardoning the failures up to January 7, 2005, given that there had been rules against naked shorting/Failing To Deliver for 71 years. She was non-responsive to that. We chatted about the foreign exchanges, and I articulated my theory that they were being used as a pretense by offshore hedge funds to Fail To Deliver - "waiting on Berlin time" as 'twere. She indicated that the SEC and the NASD had gone to Germany and satisfied themselves that no naked shorting was going on through Germany - I pointed out that I didn't say that they were naked shorting through Germany, but rather using the German exchanges as a pretense for Failing To Deliver here. She didn't like that and instead went back to her statement, attempting, I believe, to attribute it to me. I corrected her.

This seemed adversarial at this point, and I inquired why a highly intelligent, obviously informed person would be deliberately introducing fallacious arguments and attempting to re-configure my statements so that they seemed pejorative. She indicated that she thought it was dishonest of me to be Bob O'Brien rather than using my real name. I asked why that changed the truth of the message. She didn't have much to say about that, other than that I could be some sort of a stock tout or trader or something - to which I responded how did running an advocacy ad with no symbols on it constitute a stock tout - no answer from her.

We then discussed who the contributors were for NCANS, I invited her to check the Yahoo message boards so that she could see all the small investors who had posted "I sent my check" messages." She seemed really stuck on the notion that it was all some sort of a scam. Dave Patch, who runs investigatethesec.com, and who has been very helpful in bringing me up to speed on the abuses, and Gary Vallenotti, CEO of Jag Media, were both introduced to the discussion - she seemed very interested in whether they were members of NCANS or not. I indicated that they hadn't donated, but I considered them members - hey guys, you want to be members? Anyway, she then wanted to know if we were registered or licensed anywhere, and I indicated that I wasn't aware of any registration or license we required, and asked her if she did? She didn't, but acted as though we should have been. Interesting.

The topic returned to why I was a rat b*stard for not wanting the bad guys on Wall Street to have my home address and phone number. I again pointed out that not all the players on the street played by the King's rules. She poo-pooed that, and went back to what I "should" do in order to have "credibility" - I again asked why the messenger was so important when the message was so important. No reply. She indicated that if you were going to write to the President, you should be willing to sign it. I asked where the etiquette rules were as I'd misplaced my copy - there was a conspicuous lack of amusement from her end.

She brought up the Cheetah Club and BVI locations of the www.nfi-info.net website registration, and seemed annoyed at my sense of humor. I can understand that not everyone has the same sense of humor, or any, for that manner. I think it's safe to say at this point that this was fairly adversarial - there wasn't a lot of interest in hearing about the issue, but rather a non-stop barrage of "when did you stop beating your wife" sorts of questions.

We then moved to who was involved in creating the ad, and I indicated that it was an agency that had asked to remain anonymous. She hated that. Wanted to know if we had any high profile contributors - I said all would be revealed on our schedule. She asked if I'd ever heard of some other coalition, and I said I thought I had heard of something from years ago that was linked in some way to some penny stock scammers, but I could be wrong - it was a long time ago and it was an email exchange that it was mentioned in. She seemed to feel that had significance, but couldn't articulate why.

We then again returned to why I was suspect as I wouldn't say who I really was. We discussed Rocker Partners, and I indicated that they were presumed to be the large short in NFI - she reframed some of my statements, and I corrected her and indicated that I wouldn't say anything libelous about Mr. Rocker. She went back to who had threatened me, and wanted to know if I was saying that Rocker was threatening me. I replied that I was saying no such thing. And so on.

We went back to why I thought that there was a problem with naked shorting/Failing To Deliver. I pointed out that Reg SHO was proof of the Fail To Delivers being fact, not theory. We then went round and round on whether there was definitive proof that the DTCC and the NYSE and the NASD and the NASDAQ and the SEC were covering up a systemic problem. I asked what she would need other than a list of companies where the laws on the books for 71 years had been violated. She didn't have an answer for that.

She asked for Mary's phone number, which I got back to her with. Wanted to know how many checks we'd received. I told her somewhere between 50 and 100 - I wasn't sure as I'm not handling that. She wanted again to know how many members we had, I said 150-200 or so, but growing steadily.

I think it's safe to say that my chances of having dinner with Carol are slim at this point. I try to give people the benefit of the doubt, but I detected an agenda that didn't have a lot in common with telling an impartial story. So we can all assume that she will not be depicting me with a cape and a little mask, defending the downtrodden.

I hope I'm wrong, and that I misunderstood. Perhaps anyone that sent in donations can email her so she knows that real people are really upset about this and really sent money. Maybe then she'll get that we really are mad as hell and aren't going to take it any
NCANS HomeJoin NCANSNewsAds & ArticlesFAQDr. Byrne Summary on Naked ShortingSanity CheckSEC & NASD RulesWhy Care About Naked Short Selling?Bear Stearns CCDJ InterviewDJ Byrne InterviewByrne ChroniclesSEC Phone CallWhy isn't Reg SHO Working?DonateGovernment ContactsLinks

Copyright © 2005 NCANS.net

Tony Ryals
e-mail:: ncansisscam@yahoo.com





Stories contributed to this site are licensed under the
Creative Commons Non Commercial - Share Alike - By Attribution license
unless otherwise specified by the author.